Navigating the dual edges of AI for cybersecurity
Safeguarding against threats while embracing its advantages
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
Conventional cybersecurity solutions, often limited in scope, fail to provide a holistic strategy. In contrast,AI toolsoffer a comprehensive, proactive, and an adaptive approach to cybersecurity, distinguishing between benign user errors and genuine threats. It enhances threat management through automation, from detection to incident response, and employs persistent threat hunting to stay ahead of advanced threats. AI systems continuously learn and adapt, analyzing network baselines and integrating threat intelligence to detect anomalies and evolving threats, ensuring superior protection.
However, the rise of AI also introduces potential security risks, such as rogue AI posing targeted threats without sufficient safeguards. Instances likeBing’s controversial responses last year andChatGPT’s misuse for hacker teams highlight the dual-edge nature of AI. Despite new safeguards in AI systems to prevent misuse, their complexity makes monitoring and control challenging, raising concerns about AI’s potential to become an unmanageablecybersecuritythreat. This complexity underscores the ongoing challenge of ensuring AI’s safe and ethical use, mirroring sci-fi narratives closer to our reality.
Significant risks
In essence, artificial intelligence systems could potentially be manipulated or designed with harmful intentions, posing significant risks to individuals, organizations, and even entire nations. The manifestation of rogue AI could take numerous forms, each with its unique purpose and creation method, including:
One alarming aspect is AI’s extensive potential for integration into various sectors of our lives, including economic, social, cultural, political, and technological spheres. This presents a paradox, as the very capabilities that make AI invaluable across these domains also empower it to cause unprecedented harm through its speed, scalability, adaptability, and capacity for deception.
VP of Product Development, Camelot Secure.
Hazards of rogue AI
The hazards associated with rogue AI include:
Disinformation: As recently as February 15, 2024,OpenAIunveiled its “Sora” technology, demonstrating its ability to produce lifelike video clips. This advancement could be exploited by rogue AI to generate convincing yet false narratives, stirring up undue alarm and misinformation in society.
Speed: AI’s ability to process data and make decisions rapidly surpasses human capabilities, complicating efforts to counteract or defend against rogue AI threats in a timely manner.
Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Scalability: Rogue AI has the potential to duplicate itself, automate assaults, and breach numerous systems at once, causing extensive damage.
Adaptability: Sophisticated AI can evolve and adjust to new settings, rendering it unpredictable and hard to combat.
Deception: Rogue AI might impersonate humans or legitimate AI operations, complicating the identification and neutralization of such threats.
Consider the apprehension surrounding the early days of the internet, particularly within banks, stock markets, and other sensitive areas. Just as connecting to the internet exposes these sectors to cyber threats, AI introduces novel vulnerabilities and attack vectors due to its deep integration into various facets of our existence.
A particularly worrisome example of rogue AI application is the replication of human voices. AI’s capabilities extend beyond text and code, enabling it to mimic human speech accurately. The potential for harm is starkly illustrated by scenarios where AI mimics a loved one’s voice to perpetrate scams, such as convincing a grandmother to send money under false pretenses.
A proactive stance
To counter rogue AI, a proactive stance is essential. As an example, OpenAI announced Sora’s release, yet they took a disciplined approach keeping it under strict control and have not made it publicly available yet. As posted on their social media X account on 2/15/24 at 10:14am, “We’ll be taking several important safety steps ahead of making Sora available in OpenAI’s products. We are working with red teamers – domain experts in areas like misinformation, hateful content, and bias – who are adversarially testing the model.”
AI developers must take these four critical proactive steps:
Organizations must also prepare for rogue AI threats by:
It’s 2024. I think it’s redundant to say the potential dangers of rogue AI systems are probable and they shouldn’t be ignored. However, as an AI GPT advocate, I believe there is still a positive contribution in the weight of pros vs cons toward AI, and we all need to start adopting and understanding its potential sooner than later. By promoting a culture of ethical AI development and use, and emphasizing security and ethical considerations, we can minimize the risks associated with rogue AI and leverage its ability to serve the greater good of humanity.
Link!
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here:https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
Jacob Birmingham, VP of Product Development, Camelot Secure.
3 reasons why PIA fell in our best VPN rankings
Nokia confirms data breach leaked third-party code, but its data is safe
A critical Palo Alto Networks bug is being hit by cyberattacks, so patch now
